Saturday, December 5, 2015

No More Great Society: We Don’t Need More Stuff; We Need a Leader Who Will Stop Our Unraveling

for ponderment.....

the federal government is not our friend....it has become a wild gaggle of politically motivated, Constitution ignoring, power and control-hungry elite who believe they know better than every other American citizen...it must stop!


No More Great Society: We Don’t Need More Stuff; We Need a Leader Who Will Stop Our Unraveling
John Linder;  he served in Congress for 18 years from Georgia. He and his wife, Lynne, have retired to a farm in Northeast Mississippi.

What has happened to the idea that is America? When did history’s greatest experiment in freedom and opportunity begin to unravel? Did we celebrate the 50th anniversary of that event just last May?
Growing up in a small town in the 1950s was all about community. If government was discussed at all, it was about war and peace. We had been in two recent wars and elected a general to lead us.
Dr. James Nakamura was our beloved physician in Deer River, Minnesota. He drove a new Thunderbird.
Dr. Jim had file drawers of records on patients he treated for free. He viewed it as his community responsibility. He often said, “Pay me when you can.” It was not uncommon for that to be a chicken or a ham.
President Lyndon Johnson’s landslide victory over Sen. Barry Goldwater in 1964 gave Johnson immense political capital and he spent it.
In this Nov. 4, 1964, file photo, President Lyndon B. Johnson stands with hands folded Nov. 4, 1964 as his wife, Lady Bird Johnson and daughter Lynda Bird, right, acknowledge cheers of crowds that jammed Austin Memorial Auditorium to honor the President on his victory. Johnson, who carried the nickname "Landslide Lyndon" for his razor-thin 87-vote victory in a Texas Senate race, won over Barry Goldwater in 1964, 486-52. Texas Gov. John Connally is left, at podium. (AP Photo/File)On Nov. 4, 1964, President Lyndon B. Johnson defeated Arizona Sen. Barry Goldwater for president in a landslide in 1964, 486-52. Johnson used his political capital to create the Great Society. (AP Photo/File)
The Great Society, which turned 50 years old last May 22, replaced community responsibility with the War on Poverty.
Those who were struggling would be cared for and the elderly and poor would get their health care provided by a beneficent and generous government.
The world changed that day.
Doctors, whose taxes paid for the Great Society, no longer treated patients for free. They billed the government.
Those who had seldom seen a doctor decided to go more often. We never spend other people’s money as carefully as we spend our own.
As costs exploded, Congress acted to control them. Insurance companies followed suit with private patients, and soon bureaucrats were making our medical decisions.
People whose ideas fail seldom admit to failure. They generally conclude that they need to do more.
Ultimately, more and more became Obamacare.
The poverty rate in America today is approximately the same as it was $22 trillion ago when the War on Poverty began. We lost the war.
The poor got attention, but the money went to corporate America. Agribusiness has a firm grip on all government nutrition programs from school lunches to food stamps and WIC.
Other industries watched in awe and began to lobby for more government, too. They became natural allies with Democrats who also worshipped at the altar of Big Government. Crony capitalism was the result.
Presidents who followed Johnson decided that using the government to do good things was a neat idea.
Nixon gave us the EPA and food stamps. George H.W. Bush gave us the Americans with Disabilities Act. Clinton gave us the Crime Bill and Motor Voter. George W. Bush expanded Medicare with a drug entitlement, and Obama put all of the above on steroids.
As big business got our money, politicians and bureaucrats got our choices.
Some medical procedures are approved. Others not.
Some foods can be bought with food stamps. Others not.
Your cattle may drink from streams on your farm but may not urinate in them. (You and I get that. Try explaining it to the cattle.)
Even our light bulbs were determined by an act of Congress.
Government and business became so deeply intertwined that it was just a matter of time before politicians stepped up to fix bad business decisions with your money and corporate bailouts became a presidential indulgence.
WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 10: The U.S. Capitol building is seen on the evening of June 10, 2014 in Washington, DC. Alex Wong/Getty Images Former Rep. John Linder says that government believes it can run people’s lives better than individuals can. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)
As our personal and business decisions became subject to politics so did our lives. Every decision and every thought of every American became viewed through a political prism.
Those who use political power to improve our lives expect us to behave, so they bully us to be politically correct.
This week a lady said she was suspicious of the behavior of the San Bernardino terrorists but didn’t report it because she didn’t want to be accused of racial profiling.
Even issues of war and peace are driven by politics.
War has been declared on us, but we refuse to engage because it doesn’t fit the political narrative.
The saddest fact in all of this is that it could have been prevented. We know how to stop this.
These are not complicated decisions. They are made complicated by politicians calculating the political implications of every move in a desperate attempt to hold on to political power.
If we replaced those in political power today with a few thousand Americans selected at random from across the country, this would all end.
The government must be removed from everything in our lives that we can do for ourselves.
For those who simply cannot take care of themselves, their neighbors will. That worked for a few centuries before the Great Society took over.
Health care decisions must be returned to you and your doctor. Yes, even Medicare and Medicaid can be delivered by the marketplace. For veterans, we’ll pay the medical bills.
Education decisions should be returned to the county school superintendents. They did just fine until 1964.
If someone shouting Allahu Akbar kills an American, it must be recognized for what it is — an act of war by radical Islam.
We may cause some temporary damage to the environment in the desert, but we are capable of annihilating the Islamic State in a few weeks.
Iran should be told, in no uncertain terms, that we will no longer tolerate their funding of terror against Israel. They might be reminded that while they are trying to build nuclear weapons we already have them.
Vladimir Putin should be told, “You know what we are capable of. Go home.”
We are sick and tired of being lectured to about diversity. We don’t need or want any more “stuff.”
America is not a great nation because of the Great Society. We are a great nation because in America ordinary people do extraordinary things.
The political leader who understands this will commit to get government out of our way. We will put things right once again.
Whoever does understand this will find a huge reservoir of good will and support. Let us see who tries.
Email: linderje@yahoo.com Twitter: @linderje

Thursday, October 29, 2015

moving away from a strong foundation....


Way too many people today believe the converse of these statements....and it all starts with a belief that government is the way, the truth and the life...how did we get here???

and its not 'apart from the government nothing'......

it is 'apart from Him nothing'.....

Janine Turner's photo.


taking the wrong side....


Obama 'took the wrong side' on climate change, says physicist Freeman Dyson

Obama always takes the 'wrong side'….in every instance whether it is climate change or Bergdahl or Iran or the Palestinians or Benghazi or Israel or gun control or the clock kid or law enforcement or the military or illegal immigration or government sponsored infanticide or the IRS or the EPA or the DOE or the DOJ or Executive Orders or government regulation, spending and debt…he always chooses to be on the wrong side of an issue as they relate to the rule of law, the constitution, freedom and individual liberty - the foundations of this country…

And the 'wrong side' is always found to be lacking in truth, integrity and honor! 

Saturday, October 3, 2015

if they break the law....


add this to 'we have to pass it before we know what is in it'.........
how have we come this far in our legislative process?
they 'vote' on thousand page bills that no one reads nor understand which give open and non-contested power to un-elected bureaucrats...
we are no longer a nation that follows the rule of law - we have become a nation of agenda driven, debt consumed, political dictates.  
the tyranny must end!

Impeach Nancy Pelosi's photo.

Saturday, September 19, 2015

government spending cost $3 for every $1 of benefit...


inefficiency and waste is they name....
fiefdom creation is my game...
power and control is my gain....

who am I? 
your government....and we are here to help!


It Costs $3 for Every $1 that the Government Benefits Someone

Posted 13 HOURS AGO by  filed under DEBTECONOMYENTITLEMENTSSPENDINGWELFARE

Government benefits are basically an inefficient and overpriced way for society to make government do the charity we all should do.
How much do government benefits cost? According to one economist, they cost three times the benefits bestowed on the recipients. The Washington Free Beacon reports this under an incredibly positive headline, “Federal Debt Held by the Public Totals $107,000 Per Household.” I say it is positive because a friend of mind did some counting and says that, if you account for all the real debt, it gets closer to $2 million!
The federal debt held by the public totals more than $13 trillion, or about $107,000 per household in the United States, according to a report released this month by the Cato Institute.
The report, titled “Washington’s Largest Monument: Government Debt,” suggests that growing debt, which has doubled over the past seven years, poses a burden on future taxpayers and could lead to a financial crisis.
According to Cato, financing government debt through tax collection creates distortions since much of federal spending goes to subsidy and benefit programs, which reduce work incentives and savings.
One economist says that “it costs taxpayers $3 to provide a benefit worth $1 to recipients.”
It isn’t just the Cato Institute that is warning of a crisis. The Congressional Budget Office is telling us the same thing.
The distortions go far beyond reducing work incentives and savings. Government debt actually siphons savings into immediate consumption.
In a free society, people would borrow money in order to do things with that money that would make a future revenue stream that would allow them to pay the debt with interest. So entrepreneurs would, for example, borrow money to build a railroad that would make travel cheaper between two points. Then the people who bought bonds from the entrepreneur would get paid back because he didn’t use the money for immediate consumption, but in order to make something that would help people in the future.
The government offers interest rates as if loaning it money (i.e. buying treasuries, etc) is also an investment opportunity. But most of the government’s money is spent on immediate consumption. The ability to pay back the loan rests not on capital development but on future taxes.
Basically, the government competes with other businesses to attract lenders, but it doesn’t actually use the money to increase wealth in society. Rather than building wealth for the future, it creates a financial money pit.

Read more at http://politicaloutcast.com/2015/09/it-costs-3-for-every-1-that-the-government-benefits-someone/#TE5qYDtTYWhSWL5K.99

Wednesday, August 19, 2015

Why the Federal Government Fails

A recent report by the Cato Institute analyzes the endemic failure of the federal government.  The report finds causes to be deeply structural, and not to be solved with more competent officials or a different party. Americans, deeply unhappy with Washington, agree better governance is needed.  The only way to achieve it is to greatly cut the federal government's size and scope. 

Here are five reasons for its failure: 
First, policies rely on top-down planning and coercion, which creates winners and losers, unlike the mutually beneficial markets. It also means federal policies are based on guesswork because there is no price system to guide decision-making. Further, failed policies are not weeded out because they are funded by taxes, which are compulsory and not contingent on performance. 
Second, the government lacks knowledge about our complex society. Markets gather knowledge from the bottom up and are rooted in individual preferences, the government\'s actions destroy knowledge and squelch diversity. 
Third, legislators act counter to the general public interest. They use debt, an opaque tax system, and other techniques to hide the full costs of programs. Furthermore, they use logrolling to pass harmful policies that do not have broad public support.
Fourth, civil servants act within a bureaucratic system that rewards inertia, not the creation of value.  Many have tried to fix the bureaucracy, but the incentives that generate poor performance are deeply entrenched in the executive branch.
Fifth, the federal government has grown enormous in size and scope. Each increment of spending has produced less value but rising taxpayer costs. Failure has increased as legislators are overloaded with a vast array of programs. Today's federal budget is 100 times larger than the average state budget, and it is far too large to adequately oversee.

Source: Chris Edwards, "Why the Federal Government Fails," Cato InstituteJuly 27, 2015.

Friday, July 31, 2015

The Eroding Character Of The American People...


how have we, as a country -
turned those who are in power into unquestionable experts...who live above the law...

how have we, as a country -
allowed those who work for us (and were elected by us) as public servants turned us into their servants...and expect our blind allegiance.... 

how have we, as a country -
allowed the creation of a political elite that rules with enmity towards the people who elected them...while prevaricating to us with every word from their mouth....

how have we, as a country -
become so blinded to truth that we settle for agenda driven news clips while thriving upon entertainment and self-focused social media…

how have we, as a country -
traded good for evil and justify our fallen condition as tolerance and progressiveness...



Paul Craig Roberts: The Eroding Character Of The American People

The question is: why do Americans not only sit silently while the lives of innocents are destroyed, but also actually support the destruction of the lives of innocents? Why do Americans believe "official sources" despite the proven fact that “official sources” lie repeatedly and never tell the truth? The only conclusion that one can come to is that the American people have failed. We have failed Justice. We have failed Mercy. We have failed the US Constitution. We have failed Truth. We have failed Democracy and representative government. We have failed ourselves and humanity. We have failed the confidence that our Founding Fathers put in us. If we ever had the character that we are told we had, we have obviously lost it. Little, if anything, remains of the "American character."

Thursday, July 2, 2015

The Tree of Liberty


The Tree of Liberty, which is the lifeblood of our freedom and has been nourished by the blood and the sacrifice of patriots, is under siege and struggling to survive. Its roots are being systematically axed by those who seek power and control. The fruit of its branches are daily disappearing under the weight of oppressive government.  Its foundation, our constitution, has been cut and hacked and disregarded so that there are deep scars, like cancerous wounds, that are aggressively and painfully destroying its life. The Tree of Liberty is being destroyed from within…by its own caretakers!

July 2015

Saturday, June 27, 2015

quotes for consideration


The ill effects of an intrusive central government reverberate across our economic horizon resulting in less liberty for all...

Bastiat quotes for your consideration: 

When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men in a society, over the course of time they create for themselves a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it.
Each of us has a natural right, from God, to defend his person, his liberty, and his property.

Government is the great fiction, through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else.

Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.

Everyone wants to live at the expense of the state. They forget that the state wants to live at the expense of everyone.

Frederic Bastiat
Claude Frederic Bastiat was a French economist, legislator, and writer who championed private property, free markets, and limited government. Perhaps the main underlying theme of Bastiat's writings was that the free market was inherently a source of "economic harmony" among individuals, as long as government was restricted to the function of protecting the lives, liberties, and property of citizens from theft or aggression. To Bastiat, governmental coercion was only legitimate if it served "to guarantee security of person, liberty, and property rights, to cause justice to reign over all."

One of Bastiat's most important contributions to the field of economics was his admonition to the effect that good economic decisions can be made only by taking into account the "full picture." That is, economic truths should be arrived at by observing not only the immediate consequences – that is, benefits or liabilities – of an economic decision, but also by examining the long-term second and third consequences. Additionally, one must examine the decision's effect not only on a single group of people (say candlemakers) or a single industry (say candlemaking), but on all people and all industries in the society as a whole. As Bastiat famously put it, an economist must take into account both "What is Seen and What is Not Seen."

Monday, April 27, 2015

vain and aspiring men...


If ever a time should come when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin.     

Samuel Adams, 1776

Tuesday, March 31, 2015

where we are at...


4C79416D-E68B-463F-A5BB-E0FE54497E13.jpg

I believe that this pretty much sums up where we are at today as a nation...